In a response filed in Pike Circuit Court, the Commonwealth argues that DNA associated with Roy Kidd on certain items does not establish how or when it was deposited.

Prosecutors say Kidd’s DNA was not identified on clothing Spradlin was wearing when she was killed. They also dispute the defense’s interpretation of DNA found on a sock and shoes.

The prosecution points to earlier laboratory testing indicating male DNA recovered beneath Spradlin’s fingernails matched the McKinney paternal lineage, although the finding does not identify McKinney III individually.

Prosecutors also allege McKinney III had scratches on his arms and was recorded leaving the area before Spradlin was found.

The Commonwealth is asking the court to deny his request and maintain home incarceration.